Author: Sarah Armes
Editor: Sarah Anderson
This is the first in a three-part series exploring key insights from the Modality Pathfinder Lifestyles Summit 2024.
A Growing Health Crisis: The Urgency for Change
The healthcare system is facing an escalating crisis driven by rising health disparities, funding cuts, and a reactive approach to disease management. This crisis is particularly pronounced in metabolic health, where obesity and diabetes have reached unprecedented levels.
In England, nearly three-quarters of people aged 45–74 are overweight or obese. Among children, the figures are equally alarming: for every 1,000 children aged 10 and 11, 234 are obese, and 143 are overweight. This trend is contributing to the UK having the highest rates of childhood diabetes in Europe. Sedentary lifestyles, poor nutrition, and limited early health education are key factors driving this epidemic.
Diabetes, in particular, has grown to epidemic proportions. In 2021, over 4 million people in the UK were living with diabetes, and projections suggest this could rise to 5.5 million by 2030—representing 10% of the population. This trajectory is set to place an immense strain on healthcare resources.
While these issues demand urgent intervention, public health funding has been significantly reduced. Since 2015/16, the public health grant has been cut by over 25%. Key services have borne the brunt of these cuts:
NHS health check programmes: -45%
Public health advice services: -35%
Obesity prevention programmes: -27% (adults) and -16% (children)
These cuts weaken the ability to address health issues proactively, leaving the system reliant on costly, reactive measures to manage preventable chronic illnesses.
Lifestyle Medicine: A Preventative Solution
Lifestyle medicine provides a holistic approach to health by addressing root causes and prioritising prevention. It emphasises patient education, long-term health improvement, and sustainable behaviour changes over short-term fixes.
Programmes such as the Modality Wokingham Diabetes Reversal Programme (DRP) demonstrate the potential of lifestyle medicine. By combining metabolic health improvement strategies with health and wellbeing coaching, the programme achieved remarkable outcomes:
HbA1c reduction: 5.5mmol/mol (compared to 0.6mmol/mol with standard care)
De-medication rate: 90%
A&E attendance reduction: Patients in the DRP had a 37.7% lower A&E attendance rate compared to other diabetic patients, preventing an estimated 127 fewer A&E visits per 1,000 patients.
These results showcase the ability of lifestyle-focused interventions to improve health outcomes while reducing healthcare costs.
Barriers to Implementation
Despite its promise, lifestyle medicine faces significant challenges:
Perceived Expense: While medication is often free for patients with long-term conditions (LTCs) in the UK, nutritious food and lifestyle changes may be seen as costly or inaccessible.
Time Constraints: Pills are a quick and easy solution for both patients and clinicians, whereas lifestyle changes like improved nutrition and exercise require time, effort, and education.
Cultural Resistance: The healthcare system and society often default to medicalised solutions, creating an expectation of "quick fixes" through medication.
Health Literacy and Inequality: Factors like lower socioeconomic status, shift work, limited access to green spaces, and poor understanding of health concepts make lifestyle changes more challenging for many individuals.
Challenges with Coaching and Systemic Integration
Health and wellbeing coaching is central to lifestyle medicine, yet its integration faces several challenges:
Clinician Uncertainty: Many clinicians are unsure when or how to refer patients to a coach, and some may view coaching as diminishing their role.
Patient Reluctance: Patients accustomed to seeing their GP may resist coaching, especially if it involves virtual sessions or unfamiliar providers.
Practice Organisation: Workflow issues and lack of staff engagement can hinder the adoption of coaching programmes.
On a systemic level, problems include:
Commissioning and Reporting: Limited visibility of coaching appointments in centralised systems makes tracking and evaluation difficult.
Funding Models: Current structures often incentivise acute care over prevention.
Cultural Barriers: Media narratives and political focus on reactive measures perpetuate a medicalised approach to health.
Lifestyle-focused interventions have proven to reduce hospital admissions, highlighting their potential to alleviate pressure on healthcare resources. Yet, current funding priorities often overlook prevention in favour of acute care, perpetuating a cycle of high costs and poor outcomes.
Comments